2013:refactoring_to_functional
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2013:refactoring_to_functional [2012/12/24 11:23] – jonjagger | 2013:refactoring_to_functional [2016/06/11 14:05] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Jon: Steve notes - I did this last year with some colleagues, but that was demo-style\\ | Jon: Steve notes - I did this last year with some colleagues, but that was demo-style\\ | ||
| Jon: Steve notes - This version is based on Java. It could be ported to other languages that have equivalent functional constructs. I could get someone in to help with a port to C# if required.\\ | Jon: Steve notes - This version is based on Java. It could be ported to other languages that have equivalent functional constructs. I could get someone in to help with a port to C# if required.\\ | ||
| - | \\ | ||
| Roger: Like the idea, are we stymied by the size limit? \\ | Roger: Like the idea, are we stymied by the size limit? \\ | ||
| Ewan: I like the idea too, and this is an area that Steve is highly expert in. It was on the programme last year, and was a very good presentation. So this would need to be workshop based - and billed as such - to make the distinction. I think Steve probably does need a co-presenter. This is tough, but only a MAYBE \\ | Ewan: I like the idea too, and this is an area that Steve is highly expert in. It was on the programme last year, and was a very good presentation. So this would need to be workshop based - and billed as such - to make the distinction. I think Steve probably does need a co-presenter. This is tough, but only a MAYBE \\ | ||
2013/refactoring_to_functional.1356348183.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/06/11 14:05 (external edit)