2015:making_the_case_for_review
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2015:making_the_case_for_review [2014/12/18 10:45] – jonjagger | 2015:making_the_case_for_review [2016/06/11 14:05] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| still find development organizations today that don't use them. Yet we do. | still find development organizations today that don't use them. Yet we do. | ||
| In this talk I'll present some of what we know about reviews. We'll look at questions like: | In this talk I'll present some of what we know about reviews. We'll look at questions like: | ||
| - | + | \\ | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <li>How long should a review be?</li> | + | |
| - | <li>What kinds of artifacts can be usefully reviewed?</li> | + | |
| - | <li>How is the time spent in reviews accounted for in terms of quality or ROI?</ | + | |
| - | </ul> | + | |
| Some of the answers to these questions can be very eye-opening! | Some of the answers to these questions can be very eye-opening! | ||
2015/making_the_case_for_review.1418899527.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/06/11 14:05 (external edit)