2015:making_the_case_for_review
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2015:making_the_case_for_review [2014/12/18 10:55] – jonjagger | 2015:making_the_case_for_review [2016/06/11 14:05] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| development teams down. Given what we know about the efficacy of reviews, it would be surprising to | development teams down. Given what we know about the efficacy of reviews, it would be surprising to | ||
| still find development organizations today that don't use them. Yet we do. | still find development organizations today that don't use them. Yet we do. | ||
| - | In this talk I'll present some of what we know about reviews. We'll look at questions like:\\ | + | In this talk I'll present some of what we know about reviews. We'll look at questions like: |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | How long should a review be?\\ | + | |
| - | What kinds of artifacts can be usefully reviewed? | + | |
| - | How is the time spent in reviews accounted for in terms of quality or ROI?\\ | + | |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| + | * How long should a review be? | ||
| + | * What kinds of artifacts can be usefully reviewed? | ||
| + | * How is the time spent in reviews accounted for in terms of quality or ROI? | ||
| + | |||
| Some of the answers to these questions can be very eye-opening! | Some of the answers to these questions can be very eye-opening! | ||
2015/making_the_case_for_review.1418900106.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/06/11 14:05 (external edit)