2015:making_the_case_for_review
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2015:making_the_case_for_review [2014/12/18 10:58] – jonjagger | 2015:making_the_case_for_review [2016/06/11 14:05] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| In this talk I'll present some of what we know about reviews. We'll look at questions like: | In this talk I'll present some of what we know about reviews. We'll look at questions like: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | * How long should a review be?\\ | + | * How long should a review be? |
| - | * What kinds of artifacts can be usefully reviewed?\\ | + | * What kinds of artifacts can be usefully reviewed? |
| - | * How is the time spent in reviews accounted for in terms of quality or ROI?\\ | + | * How is the time spent in reviews accounted for in terms of quality or ROI? |
| Some of the answers to these questions can be very eye-opening! | Some of the answers to these questions can be very eye-opening! | ||
2015/making_the_case_for_review.1418900317.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/06/11 14:05 (external edit)